Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 22 - Patterson v. Knight

Patterson v. Knight’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nielsen v. Gold's Gym · McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · Shaw v. Kennedy, Ltd. · Sackler v. Savin · 2009 UT App 301 - Ld III, LLC v. Bbrd, Lc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. ¶ 2. Here, the language in the MOU is even less helpful to ACC. Unlike the written agreement in Patterson , the MOU did not contain language signaling that the preparation of such documents was a condition precedent to the finality of the agreement. See id. ¶ 10. Instead of using words such as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is common for parties to later memorialize in a more formal document agreements created in mediation. This arrangement does not preclude the enforcement or finality of the agreement created in mediation so long as the terms are 'sufficiently definite as to be capable of being enforced.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]ubject to drafting mutually acceptable settlement agreement w/ above provisions and mutual non-disparagement, and [additional agreements].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.