Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 233 - State v. Hull

State v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Keeble v. United States · Layton City v. Carr · State v. Baker · State v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And because both deficient performance and resulting prejudice are requisite elements in a successful ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even the best criminal defense attorneys would not defend a particular client in the same way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no objectively competent attorney would have adopted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.