Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UT App 45 - Oldroyd v. Oldroyd

2017 UT App 45 - Oldroyd v. Oldroyd’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2008 UT App 11 - Stonehocker v. Stonehocker · Burt v. Burt · Hall v. Hall · Taft v. Taft · Wohnoutka v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Findings of fact are adequate to support the district court's financial determinations only when they are sufficiently detailed to disclose the steps by which the district court reached its ultimate conclusion on each issue,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e are unable to trace with accuracy the steps by which the district court reached its ultimate conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “considerable discretion in determining the financial interests of divorcing parties”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.