Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 7 - State v. Neilson

State v. Neilson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Helms · State v. Galli · State v. Butterfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because trial courts are afforded wide latitude in sentencing, a court's sentencing decision is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. A court exceeds its discretion if it acts with inherent unfairness in imposing a sentence, imposes a clearly excessive sentence, or fails to consider all legally relevant factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.