Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 77 - Veysey v. Nelson

Veysey v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood · Miller Superintendent Pendleton Correctional Facility v. French · Lee v. Gaufin · Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co. · Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Horne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to successfully assert a laches defense, a defendant must establish both that the plaintiff unreasonably delayed in bringing an action and that the defendant was prejudiced by that delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “we review the trial court's conclusions of law for correctness and will disturb its findings of fact only if they are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The application of laches to a particular set of facts and circumstances presents a mixed question of law and fact,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.