Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UT App 89 - State v. Taylor

2017 UT App 89 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Florida v. Bostick · United States v. Sharpe · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Ohio v. Robinette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the court's factual findings are reviewed for clear error, its legal conclusions are reviewed for correctness, including its application of law to the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We review a [district] court's decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress for an alleged Fourth Amendment violation as a mixed question of law and fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.