Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 CO 13 - Pernell v. People

Pernell v. People’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tevlin v. People · People v. Gaffney · People v. Eppens · Yusem v. People · Crider v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantially influenced the verdict or affected the fairness of the trial proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e have never reduced the question of a trial error's prejudicial impact to a specific set of factors[,] ... the strength of the properly admitted evidence supporting the guilty verdict is clearly an 'important consideration' in the harmless error analysis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is no reasonable possibility that [the error] contributed to the defendant 's conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.