People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · California v. Hodari D. · People v. Gennings · People v. Valdez · People v. Paynter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“free to disregard the questions and walk away, there has been no intrusion upon that person's liberty or privacy as would under the Constitution require some particularized and objective justification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Police officers do not implicate the protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment by merely asking an individual questions, even when those questions might pertain to criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the police 'seize' a citizen, they must comply with those protections. Not every interaction with the police, however, is a seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.