Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 CO 76 - Lewis v. Taylor

Lewis v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scholes v. Lehmann · Donell v. Kowell · Sender v. Buchanan · Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Richardson) · Perkins v. Haines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor, whether the creditor's claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation: ... (b) Without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor: (I) Was engaged or was about to engage in a business or transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or (II) Intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts beyond his ability to pay as they became due.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “deplet[ed] the debtor's assets under the guise of a profitable business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not every Ponzi scheme lacks a legitimate source of earnings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.