People v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 215 Ill. 2d 167 - People v. Herron · 238 Ill. 2d 598 - People v. Thompson · 103 Ill. 2d 472 - People v. Zehr · 229 Ill. 2d 584 - People v. Naylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That standard seems quite simple, but the opposite is true. A reviewing court's inquiry involves an assessment of the evidence on the elements of the charged offense or offenses, along with any evidence regarding the witnesses' credibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining whether the evidence adduced at trial was close, a reviewing court must evaluate the totality of the evidence and conduct a qualitative, commonsense assessment of it within the context of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A Rule 431(b) violation is not cognizable under the second prong of the plain-error doctrine absent evidence that the violation produced a biased jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.