Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 MT 21 - Cox. v. Magers

Cox. v. Magers’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & Son · Searock v. Stripling · Richardson v. State · Owen v. F. A. Buttrey Co. · United States v. International Union of Petroleum & Industrial Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we generally encourage trial courts to make accommodations for parties choosing to represent themselves ... [a]ny latitude given to self-represented litigants cannot be so wide as to prejudice the other party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “District courts are better positioned than we are to evaluate the conduct and good faith of parties during discovery, and as such they enjoy considerable leeway in sanctioning discovery abuses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.