Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 MT 55 - State v. T. Ritesman

State v. T. Ritesman’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Aker · State v. Hart · State v. W. Lawrence · State v. Bekemans · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “make sure that [the victim] is safe, to make sure that she is heard, and that we give the control back to her.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Conducting a full analysis in order to determine whether to find plain error would defeat the underlying rule that a party must object to error at trial, because errors should be brought to the attention of the trial court where they can be initially addressed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We use our inherent power of common law plain error review sparingly, on a case-by-case basis, and only in a narrow class of cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.