Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 OHIO 1009 - State v. Marcum

State v. Marcum’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court will overturn a conviction due to the manifest weight of the evidence only in extraordinary circumstances when the evidence presented at trial weighs heavily in favor of acquittal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “inclination of the greater amount of credible evidence, offered at a trial, to support one side of the issue rather than the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.