Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 OHIO 133 - State v. Hudson

State v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · State v. Barnes · Eastley v. Volkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “holding that '[j]oint possession * * * exists when two or more persons together have the ability to control an object, exclusive of others'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “also had access to the drugs in the locked bedroom * * * does not vitiate [Hudson's] conviction since the brothers could have had joint possession and control of the drugs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.