Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 OHIO 17 - In Re D.H.

In Re D.H.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bickerstaff · In re A.J.S. · State v. Muncie · State v. Anderson · In re Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The final-order requirement comes from the Ohio Constitution, which provides that courts of appeals 'shall have such jurisdiction as may be provided by law' to review 'final orders' rendered by inferior courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “upon an appeal upon questions of law to review, affirm, modify, set aside, or reverse judgments or final orders of courts of record inferior to the court of appeals within the district.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and parties in the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.