Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 OHIO 2249 - State v. Cozzone

State v. Cozzone’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion) · State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion) · State v. Arnett · Pitts v. Ohio Department of Transportation · 63 Ohio St. 3d 597 - State ex rel. Hansen v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); and Amburgey v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. , 12th Dist. Madison No. CA2001-07-016, 2001 WL 1256365 (Oct. 22, 2001) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]lthough appellant was not charged or convicted for this conduct, overdosing on drugs is criminal in nature and cannot be considered a "technical”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the conditions of a community control sanction are violated or if the offender violates a law or leaves the state without the permission of the court or the offender's probation officer, the sentencing court may impose upon the violator one or more of the following penalties[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.