State v. Cleavenger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]hen a court takes judicial notice, it is incumbent on a party (who wants to later oppose its taking of judicial notice) to challenge the judicial notice-taken [sic] by objecting * * *. Without such an objection and/or request to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice, the matter is waived.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Pollard v. Elber

2. “[W]hether the results of any speed measuring device, using either radar or laser technology, is admissible without expert testimony establishing, or the taking of judicial notice of, the scientific reliability of the principles underlying the technology.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 154 Ohio St. 3d 1520 - Brookpark v. Rodojev

3. “Appellate courts have concluded the lack of foundation for a speed measuring device implicates the sufficiency of the evidence where judicial notice was not taken”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. In re Z.E.N.