Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 Ohio 5402 - Doe v. Skaggs

Doe v. Skaggs’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. · 122 Ohio App. 3d 378 - Brewer v. Cleveland City Schools Board of Education · 104 Ohio App. 3d 598 - Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he moving party bears the initial responsibility of informing the trial court of the basis for the motion, and identifying those portions of the record which demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of fact on a material element of the nonmoving party's claim." (Emphasis deleted.) Dresher v. Burt , 75 Ohio St.3d 280 , 296, 662 N.E.2d 264 (1996). If the moving party carries its burden, the nonmoving party has a reciprocal burden of setting forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. Id. at 293 [ 662 N.E.2d 264 ]. In other words, when presented with a properly supported motion for summary judgment, the nonmoving party must produce some evidence to suggest that a reasonable factfinder could rule in that party's favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.