State v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Maryland v. Wilson · 93 Ohio App. 3d 586 - State v. Retherford · State v. Robinette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]ince the police surely cannot be held accountable for the unforeseeable results of their words or actions, the definition of interrogation can extend only to words or actions on the part of police officers that they should have known were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Malcolm“'Interrogation' must reflect 'a measure of compulsion above and beyond that inherent in custody itself.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Malcolm“[p]olice officers are not responsible for unforeseeable incriminating responses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Malcolm
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.