Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 OKCIVAPP 2 - WATKINS v. HAMM

WATKINS v. HAMM’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Aronson v. Lewis · Brehm v. Eisner · Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) who suffered the alleged harm (the corporation or the stockholders, individually); and (2) who would receive the benefit of any recovery or other remedy (the corporation or the stockholders, individually)?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to plead a direct claim under Tooley , a 'stockholder must demonstrate that the duty breached was owed to the stockholder and that he or she can prevail without showing an injury to the corporation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “been the subject of confusion and criticism in the courts of Delaware, [and] that case may be on the verge of being abrogated or, at least, significantly limited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.