Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UT 17 - State v. Wilder

State v. Wilder’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Lockhart v. Fretwell · State v. Buggs · Archuleta v. Galetka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On review of a jury verdict, we recite the evidence, and all the reasonable inferences that flow from the evidence, in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “that the controlling test is the statutory standard set forth in Utah Code section 76-1-402(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[a] defendant may be prosecuted in a single criminal action for all separate offenses arising out of a single criminal episode; however, when the same act of a defendant under a single criminal episode shall establish offenses which may be punished in different ways under different provisions of this code, the act shall be punishable under only one such provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.