Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UT 60 - State v. Beverly

State v. Beverly’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Johnson · State v. Clark · Patterson v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the cumulative error doctrine, we will reverse only if the cumulative effect of the several errors undermines our confidence that a fair trial was had.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he cumulative-error doctrine has no application when only a single error has been determined or assumed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.