2018 UT App 101 - State v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Johnson · Bailey v. Bayles · Patterson v. Patterson · State v. Dean · State v. Winfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Proximate cause has two elements. First, but-for causation must be present; indeed, proximate cause is that cause which, in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any new cause, produced the injury, and without which the injury would not have occurred. Second, the harm must be foreseeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The mandate rule, a subset of the law of the case doctrine, binds both the district court and the parties to honor the mandate of the appellate court. Under this rule, the decisions of an appellate court become the law of the case and cannot be reconsidered on remand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is the State's burden to prove that the victim has suffered economic injury and that the injury arose out of the defendant's criminal activities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.