Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UTAPP 123 - State v. Biebinger

State v. Biebinger’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Drope v. Missouri · State v. Clark · State v. Curtis · Jacobs v. State · State v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the facts that were known to [Bruhn's trial counsel] at the time [of trial] simply do not amount to obvious signals of incompetency,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “had no basis to suspect [the defendant] was incompetent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.