Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UTAPP 202 - State v. Hamilton

State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Ott · State v. Helms · State v. Ogden · State v. Thurston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Money from the new investors is used directly to repay or pay interest to earlier investors, [usually] without any operation or revenue-producing activity other than the continual raising of new funds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fraudulent investment scheme in which money contributed by later investors generates artificially high dividends or returns for the original investors, whose example attracts even larger investments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'[c]ourt-ordered restitution' means the restitution the court having criminal jurisdiction orders the defendant to pay as a part of the criminal sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.