Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UT App 21 - State v. Carrell

2018 UT App 21 - State v. Carrell’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Nielsen · State v. Robbins · State v. Prater · Cheves v. Williams · State v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “2. Intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly: a. touched the anus, buttocks, or genitals, of [M.F. and S.B.], even if accomplished through clothing; or b. touched [M.F.'s and S.B.'s] breast[s], even if accomplished though clothing; or c. took indecent liberties with [M.F. and S.B.]; or d. caused [M.F. and S.B.] to take indecent liberties with [Cegers] or another; and 3. Did so with the intent to: a. cause substantial emotional or bodily pain to any person; or b. arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; and 4. [M.F. and S.B. were] under 14 years old at the time of the conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict and uphold the verdict if we conclude that some evidence exists from which a reasonable jury could find that the elements of the crime have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.