Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UT App 38 - Bond v. Bond

2018 UT App 38 - Bond v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kimball v. Kimball · 2010 UT App 139 - Connell v. Connell · State v. Menzies · Barrani v. Barrani · Kidd v. Kidd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]either the statute nor any case law of which we are aware requires trial witnesses to identify a position with a specific employer that meets a spouse's employment needs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the existence of conflicting evidence is not sufficient to set aside a [district] court's finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.