State v. Grunwald’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Litherland · Layton City v. Carr · State v. Garcia · State v. Calliham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'An accomplice must ... have the intent that the underlying offense be committed.' " State v. Lomu , 2014 UT App 41 , ¶ 20, 321 P.3d 243 (omission in original) (quoting State v. Briggs , 2008 UT 75 , ¶ 14, 197 P.3d 628 ). In other words, "accomplice liability adheres only when the accused acts with the mens rea to commit the principal offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an accomplice cannot be convicted based on a lesser mental state than that required to commit the underlying [principal] offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.