Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UTAPP 51 - State v. McLeod

State v. McLeod’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Arvizu · Illinois v. Wardlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing the [district] court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, we recite the relevant facts in the light most favorable to the [district] court's findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “carried out in a manner reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the interference in the first place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reweigh the evidence in light of the new legal theory or alternate ground.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.