2018 UT App 70 - State v. Lantz’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Clark · State v. Lee · State v. Mohamud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must overcome the strong presumption that his trial counsel rendered adequate assistance by persuading the court that there was no conceivable tactical basis for counsel's actions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a reasonable probability exists that but for the deficient conduct defendant would have obtained a more favorable outcome at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Horvath“demonstrate that any deficiencies in counsel's performance were prejudicial to the defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.