Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2019 ND 135 - Olson v. State

Olson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hooks v. State · State v. Lind · Falcon v. State · Greywind v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, applied through the Fourteenth Amendment to the States, and Article I, Section 12, of the North Dakota Constitution guarantee criminal defendants effective assistance of counsel. State v. Garge , 2012 ND 138 , ¶ 10, 818 N.W.2d 718 . An ineffective assistance of counsel claim involves a mixed question of law and fact, fully reviewable by this Court. Flanagan [ v. State ], 2006 ND 76 , ¶ 9, 712 N.W.2d 602 . In order to prevail on a post-conviction claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, an applicant must show (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687-96, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). An applicant raising a post-conviction claim for ineffective assistance of counsel has the "heavy burden" of establishing the requirements of the two-prong Strickland test. Flanagan , at ¶ 10.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if it is not supported by any evidence, or if, although there is some evidence to support the finding, a reviewing court is left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake [h]as been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.