Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2019 ND 173 - State v. Overholt

State v. Overholt’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kottenbroch · State v. Ebertz · State v. Berger · State v. Olson · State v. Hass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"4. A court, upon application or its own motion, may defer imposition of sentence. The court must place the defendant on probation during the period of deferment. An order deferring imposition of sentence is reviewable upon appeal from a verdict or judgment. In any subsequent prosecution, for any other offense, the prior conviction for which imposition of sentence is deferred may be pleaded and proved, and has the same effect as if probation had not been granted or the information or indictment dismissed under section 12.1-32-07.1."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[¶12] Additionally, before March 1, 2019, N.D.R.Crim.P. 32.1 1 provided:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.