HAMMICK v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Edwards v. Arizona · Jackson v. Denno · Montejo v. Louisiana · 2006 OK CR 19 - Hogan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the relinquishment of the right must have been voluntary in the sense that it was the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. Second, the waiver must have been made with a full awareness both of the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. Only if the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation reveal both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension may a court properly conclude that the Miranda rights have been waived.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“gives proposed evidence its maximum reasonable probative force and its minimum reasonable prejudicial value.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, needless presentation of cumulative evidence, or unfair and harmful surprise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.