Thorne v. Thorne

¶1Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the sole ground that there is no sufficient proof in that there is no evidence showing that the Norris E. Thorne mentioned in plaintiff’s ' Exhibit 1 is the defendant in this action. Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Maiming, JJ., concur; Kelby, J., votes to reverse and grant the decree of annulment.