Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 A.D. 736

Mintz v. Mintz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1922-05-15

Decided 1922-05-15

Per Curiam:

¶1It having been made to appear to the court upon the application for a stay pending the appeal from the order appointing a receiver herein that, upon the objections made to the personality of the receiver, the Special Term has entered an order on consent appointing a receiver acceptable to both parties, the stay heretofore granted is vacated and the order appealed from affirmed in so far as it determined that a receiver should be appointed and provided for the incidental duties and the necessary injunctions to make such order effective. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ. Stay vacated and order affirmed in so far as it determined that a receiver should be appointed and provided for the incidental duties and - the necessary injunctions to make said order effective. Settle order on notice.

/202/ad/736 · .json · Public domain