¶1Judgment and order of the City Court of New Rochelle reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it was error to exclude the question asked the landlord upon cross-examination bearing upon the good faith of the landlord’s contention that she desired to recover possession of said premises for the immediate and personal occupancy by herself and her family.
¶2See Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subds. 1, 1-a, as added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199.—• [Rep.