Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ala. 21 - Russell v. State

Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1990

9 state decisions

20191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ford v. State · Wright v. State · Harrison v. State · Gandy v. State · Cheney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party cannot complain of the admission of irrelevant evidence, offered in rebuttal to irrelevant evidence introduced by himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.