Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ala. 43 - Frederick v. Hartley

Frederick v. Hartley’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
March 1966
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 1966 · most notably Heflin v. Heflin (1922), Harris v. Bowles (1922)

29 state decisions

80191819201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bancroft v. Otis · Cockrell v. Gurley · Lyons v. Campbell · Goldsby v. Goldsby · Overton v. Moseley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the grantor has for a long time acquiesced in the transaction without complaint, if not amounting to laches, it is strongly persuasive of the validity of the transaction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.