¶1 Petition of F. B. Buck for certiorari to the Court of Appeals* to review aud revise the judgment of said court rendered in the cause of Owensboro Banking Co. v. F. B. Buck, 16 Ala. App. 346, 77 South. 940.
¶2 Writ denied.
202 Ala. 56
79 So 394
Decided April 25, 1918
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1918-04-25
Suit by F. B. Buck against the Bransford Mills of Kentucky, in which the Owensboro Banking Company filed a claim to property attached. There was a judgment of the Court of Appeals (16 Ala. App. 346, 77 South. 940), reversing a judgment holding the property subject I to attachment, and plaintiff petitions for certiorari.
Relies on 16 Ala. App. 346 - Owensboro Banking Co. v. Buck
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Writ denied · Decided 1918-04-25
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1997
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Petition of F. B. Buck for certiorari to the Court of Appeals* to review aud revise the judgment of said court rendered in the cause of Owensboro Banking Co. v. F. B. Buck, 16 Ala. App. 346, 77 South. 940.
¶2 Writ denied.