Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ala. 616 - Hendrix v. Mobile Register

Hendrix v. Mobile Register’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 1967
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1967

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

50191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sillars v. Collier · Wofford v. Meeks · Advertiser Co. v. Jones · Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Crudup

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a statement, in order to be defamatory of one in respect to public office need not import a charge of crime, yet it must go so far as to impute to him some incapacity or lack of due qualification to fill the position, or some positive past misconduct which will injuriously affect him in it, or the holding of principles which are hostile to the maintenance of government. Sillars v. Collier, 151 Mass. 50 , 23 N.E. 723 , 6 L.R.A. 680 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.