Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ariz. 35 - McDonald v. Thomas

McDonald v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ruiz v. Hull · J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors · State v. Marquez · Bolin v. Superior Court · Kerby v. State Ex Rel. Frohmiller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The second factor, the propriety of [the other branchs] regulation, is measured by determining whether the [other branchs] involvement is cooperative or coercive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.