Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ariz. 427 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Enmund v. Florida · Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · Tison v. Arizona · State v. Atwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A]ccomplice” means a person ... who with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of an offense: 1. Solicits or commands another person to commit the offense; or 2. Aids, counsels, agrees to aid or attempts to aid another person in planning or committing the offense[;] 3. Provides means or opportunity to another person to commit the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. A person commits first degree murder if: 2. Acting either alone or with one or more other persons the person commits or attempts to commit [certain enumerated felonies] and in the course of and in furtherance of the offense or immediate flight from the offense, the person or another person causes the death of any person. B. Homicide, as prescribed in subsection A, paragraph 2 of this section, requires no specific mental state other than what is required for the commission of any of the enumerated felonies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e hold that section 13-303(A)(3) imposes criminal accountability on an accomplice defendant only for those offenses the defendant intended to aid or aided another in planning or committing. In this case, if [defendant] did not intend to aid [the principal] in committing murder, he could not be an accomplice to murder under the terms of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.