Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 CALAPP2D 261 - Westcott v. Hamilton

Westcott v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 3 Cal. 2d 427 - Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co. · 49 Cal. 2d 652 - Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co. · Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co. · Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHugh · Johnston v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “one who does not see that which is clearly visible and would have been seen by one exercising ordinary care, as result of which a collision occurs, is guilty of negligence as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.