Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 F. 1021

Docket No. 1,124.

The Edna V. Crew

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1913.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1913-02-14

<p>Appeal and Cross-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Edmund Waddill, Jr., Judge.</p>

3 counsel of record

Relies on The Edna V. Crew

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1913-02-14

¶1Appeal and Cross-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Edmund Waddill, Jr., Judge.

¶2Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and ROSE, District Judge.

¶3H. H. Little, of Norfolk, Va. (Hughes, Little & Seawell, of Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for Joseph M. Clark & Co., claimants of the Edna V. Crew, appellants.

¶4Floyd Hughes, of Norfolk, Va. (Thomas H. Willcox and Hughes & Vandeventer, all of Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for N. Y., P. & N. R. Co., claimant of the Portsmouth and the N. Y., P. & N. R. R. Co. No. 2, appellee and appellant.

¶5Edward S. Dodge, of Boston, *1022Mass. (Benjamin Thompson, of Portland, Me., on the brief), for J. S. Wins-low & Co.; claimants of the Baker Palmer, appellee and appellant.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Our study of the record in this case impels us to the conclusion that the court below entered a decree fully, justified by the evidence and the law applicable thereto. Being in full accord with the opinion he filed, we deem it unnecessary to refer to and discuss the facts he has so fully considered therein. 182 Fed. 890. The decree appealed from is without error. Affirmed.

/202/f1d/1021 · .json · Public domain