Inland Freight Lines v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
202 F.2d 169 · 1953
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 1988 · most notably Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad (1967), United States v. Bray (1976)
19 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 49 U.S.C. § 322
Relies on Messenger v. Anderson · United States v. Illinois Central Railroad · New York Central Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States · Insurance Group Committee v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad · Wichita Royalty Co v. City Nat Bank of Wichita Falls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To warrant disqualification of a judge, the affidavit must contain more than mere conclusions on the part of the pleader. Facts must be pleaded which show that there exists personal bias and prejudice on the part of the trial judge. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.