United States v. Konovsky’s Empirical Analysis
202 F.2d 721 · 1953
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably United States v. Bernard L. Barker, United States of America v. Eugenio R. Martinez (1976), Ferrell v. Pierce (1986)
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Screws v. United States · United States v. Classic · Krulewitch v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Helvering v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One who objects and excepts to an erroneous ruling which permits his opponent to present improper evidence does not waive or lose his objection or exception, or his right to a new trial on account of it, by his subsequent introduction of the same class of evidence in support of his case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.