Chandler v. Mock’s Empirical Analysis
202 F.2d 755 · 1953
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2005
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. Daniels · Burns v. Curtis · Kruger v. Resnick · 24 App. D.C. 462 - Paul v. Hess
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The board in reaching its conclusion properly proceeded in accordance with an established principle of patent law that tests of a complex mechanical device consisting of an aircraft carburetor must establish that the carburetor would satisfactorily operate under conditions of use, real or simulated, for which it was intended to function; namely, flight conditions * * * ”. At 757 of 202 F.2d. * * •» “The practicability of the invention should have been established by timely tests which adequately embraced the essential conditions which the carburetor would be re quired to meet in actual service on an airplane.” At 758 of 202 F.2d.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.