Dunbar v. Cranor’s Empirical Analysis
202 F.2d 949 · 1953
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2002
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Biddle · 31 Wash. 2d 52 - In Re Pierce v. Smith · Sanford v. Missouri · Nichols v. Kubina · Small v. Webster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The person having the physical custody of the prisoner, who is capable of bringing him into court, is the only person who may properly be named respondent in a petition for habeas corpus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Blango v. Thornburgh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.