United States of America v. Jason Allen Herr’s Empirical Analysis
202 F.3d 1014 · 2000
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Edwards (2002), United States v. Frank (2004)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koon v. United States · United States v. Feola · Burns v. United States · United States v. Willis · United States v. Carey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding the likelihood that a defendant may commit other crimes, a court may take into account any evidence of obvious incorrigibility and conclude that leniency has not been effective.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“applies to any ... obstructive conduct in respect to the official investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense where there is a separate count of conviction for such conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a defendant's `separate count of conviction for obstructive conduct [is] a sufficient foundation for the obstruction-of-justice enhancement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.