Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 F.3d 1199 - Gotocom Inc v. The Walt Disney Company Disney Enterprises Inc Infoseek Corporation Montrose Corporation

Gotocom Inc v. The Walt Disney Company Disney Enterprises Inc Infoseek Corporation Montrose Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

160
cited by 160 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

29 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 160 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 213 F. Supp. 2d 1146 - Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc. (2002), Department of Parks and Re-Creation for the State of California v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc., a California Corporation (2006)

29 district · 5 state decisions

820200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 · Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E · Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. · Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Company · Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 160 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he greater the similarity between the two marks at issue, the greater the likelihood of confusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A mark's strength is 'evaluated in terms of its conceptual strength and commercial strength.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “has always been considered a critical question in the likelihood-of-confusion analysis.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.